On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Evan David Light <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2008, at 12:14 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> What you're proposing might look this: >> >> Scenario: division >> Given a numerator >> And a denominator >> Then the calculator should provide a quotient >> >> |numerator|denominator|quotient| >> >> This will put some constraints on the phrasing that might be a good >> thing, might not. >> > > > I agree that my proposal is not necessarily the answer. > > >> What if we just allowed free text in there that was not at all bound >> to the table: >> >> Examples: division >> When you divide a numerator by a denominator, >> the calculator should provide the quotient. >> >> |numerator|denominator|quotient| >> >> WDYTAT? > > I believe that binding the table to the phrasing would be immensely > useful and perhaps even crucial to Scenario authors.
Can you give an example of how this would be helpful? > Also, couldn't your second example also support binding to the table > headers? Anything is possible :) How would you envision that working. What would trigger binding one word in a phrase to a header? _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
