On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Evan David Light <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2008, at 11:51 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> Please keep in mind that this is an *additional* way to do things - >> you can still write your steps exactly as you do in Story Runner, >> using regexps. > > Ah, good point. I missed that nuance in your comment on my blog. > > Perhaps the presence of the FIT table should alter Cucumber's behavior WRT > Scenario? This could allow the original Story Runner syntax to hold. > However, it would also allow, in the presence of a FIT table, for a > Scenario to serve as a template.
What you're proposing might look this: Scenario: division Given a numerator And a denominator Then the calculator should provide a quotient |numerator|denominator|quotient| This will put some constraints on the phrasing that might be a good thing, might not. What if we just allowed free text in there that was not at all bound to the table: Examples: division When you divide a numerator by a denominator, the calculator should provide the quotient. |numerator|denominator|quotient| WDYTAT? > > WDYT? (had to consider that acronym when I first saw it today). > > Evan > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
