http://synthesis.rubyforge.org/ *just* showed up in my feedreader (well, the links at the bottom did)
On Jan 11, 2008 9:28 PM, Jay Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you were to rename deposit to credit, and withdraw to debit > > I'm more concerned with adding a parameter or changing the default value of a > parameter. My fear is that given enough time and size there will be a fair > number of inconsistent mocks or mocks that aren't doing any real testing. It > feels a bit like forced exception handling in java. Yeah. I played with Synthesis a bit, and it doesn't handle this case. It's very early on though. I'm not sure that you'll end up with a number of inconsistent mocks...because if you have integration tests covering everything, then you'll know pretty quickly when your tests aren't up to par. But it's not like you'd have a bunch of passing tests and broken production code, and deploy that out. Using mocks without acceptance tests is like using Ruby without any tests. It's just stupid. > Does anyone know of any open source ruby apps (preferably rails) that use > good BDD so I can see how it's done right rather than ask a bunch of > questions? Not really. Rick Olsen has a Rails example app that uses specs. There are a bunch of published plugins that use specs. I'm working on a bliki thing in my spare time (which means never) which will be open source. Pat _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
