> If you were to rename deposit to credit, and withdraw to debit

I'm more concerned with adding a parameter or changing the default value of a 
parameter. My fear is that given enough time and size there will be a fair 
number of inconsistent mocks or mocks that aren't doing any real testing. It 
feels a bit like forced exception handling in java.

> User stories represent some facet of behavior which, once completed,
> provides value to the customer.  In short, working software.  By
> definition, then, stories must use real production implementations of
> objects instead of mocks.  This means they work quite nicely as
> integration tests as well.


Does anyone know of any open source ruby apps (preferably rails) that use good 
BDD so I can see how it's done right rather than ask a bunch of questions?



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to