> If you were to rename deposit to credit, and withdraw to debit
I'm more concerned with adding a parameter or changing the default value of a
parameter. My fear is that given enough time and size there will be a fair
number of inconsistent mocks or mocks that aren't doing any real testing. It
feels a bit like forced exception handling in java.
> User stories represent some facet of behavior which, once completed,
> provides value to the customer. In short, working software. By
> definition, then, stories must use real production implementations of
> objects instead of mocks. This means they work quite nicely as
> integration tests as well.
Does anyone know of any open source ruby apps (preferably rails) that use good
BDD so I can see how it's done right rather than ask a bunch of questions?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
