On 05/07/2009, at 04:03, Laurent Gautier wrote: > monipol wrote: >> On 04/07/2009, at 18:18, Laurent Gautier wrote: >>> I finally patched and built win32 binaries for Python2.6/rpy2.0.6. >>> >>> 2.0.6 does not have user-visible changes compared to 2.0.5, but >>> since the code was patched to let the win32 build and run the >>> version >>> number was bumped. >>> >>> The win32 binary and source can be found on sourceforge, the >>> source is >>> otherwise on Pypi. >> Hello, Laurent. Does this mean you won't be releasing RPy2 on >> SourceForge.net any longer? > > It doesn't. > Pypi is convenient for people using easy_install, so I will try > releasing on both > (I tried putting the win32 build on Pypi, but it ended with an error > message claiming an invalid package format).
Ok, I've noticed that. I was temporarily confused because 2.0.6 is in a .zip package instead of .tar.gz, but I've already tested it and submitted it to Fink. >> I've just built 2.0.6 on Mac OS X via Fink and it worked fine. > > Good to hear that it is finally working. Cheers, -- monipol ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rpy-list mailing list rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list
