monipol wrote:
> On 04/07/2009, at 18:18, Laurent Gautier wrote:
>> I finally patched and built win32 binaries for Python2.6/rpy2.0.6.
>>
>> 2.0.6 does not have user-visible changes compared to 2.0.5, but
>> since the code was patched to let the win32 build and run the version
>> number was bumped.
>>
>> The win32 binary and source can be found on sourceforge, the source is
>> otherwise on Pypi.
> 
> 
> Hello, Laurent. Does this mean you won't be releasing RPy2 on  
> SourceForge.net any longer?

It doesn't.
Pypi is convenient for people using easy_install, so I will try 
releasing on both
(I tried putting the win32 build on Pypi, but it ended with an error 
message claiming an invalid package format).

> I've just built 2.0.6 on Mac OS X via Fink and it worked fine.
> 

Good to hear that it is finally working.




L.



> Cheers,
> 
> --
> monipol
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> rpy-list mailing list
> rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rpy-list mailing list
rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list

Reply via email to