pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#2197)
Collecting musings from the draft PR for further processing:
It seems to me %{_isa} should match the multiarch marker we add. The current
basearch-bits ISA info clearly is closely related, and in its current form
insufficient to express what it needs in a world of real multiarch. One thing
currently missing in %{_isa} is the endianess, and that links us back to this
older ticket requesting a macro for determining the endianess: #365. The other
part is the flags which seems trickier because of how it's all generated from
installplatform based on some arch names - there should be some kind of clear
mapping of these things that is not a case-statement in a shell-script π€ͺ
Another issue brought up by @voxik is that this seems to make noarch ->
buildarch dependencies even more painful (#3579)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2197#issuecomment-2668086788
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2197/2668086...@github.com>_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
