The latest version you've pushed looks fine. The only remaining questions are:
* Do we care that `replace` can be set to `0` and thus not use `rename(2)` for
insertion? The latter is mandated by the spec, although it seems redundant,
with the writelock in place
*
[How](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3341#issuecomment-2467869752)
do we externally name the store
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3437#issuecomment-2470064550
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3437/c2470064...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
