Sorry to bring this up again, but it is common practice to refer to
(sub-package) versions (statically, not using a macro) in changelog entries.
So are you saying this should be avoided and that versions of Sub-packages
should always matche versions of main package?
Also, same bug declaration (http://rpm.org/ticket/27) seems to mention that
there should not be multiple description macros, which once again seems quite
weird.
I could hear that description are only spec-level things, though in the end
they are added to packages, and it feels right that each package has a distinct
description, as they are not purposed to install the same thing.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/fe8c82549aee176524e0e94786596683cd7a402d#commitcomment-17627139
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
