Thanks for testing. Glad to hear it's working well for you.
> After publishing the next version maybe we could _discuss_ "simplifying"
> the interface instead of adding new features.
Definitely sounds like a good idea.
> For example, what do you
> think about the separate midi and audio mixers and their layout,
> reducing the multiple appearance of features in many menus.
I would recommend that we open a feature request and provide a few
examples of specific simplifications to get things started.
https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/feature-requests/
Not sure if you have an account on sourceforge. If not, just post a
few examples here and I'll get the feature request started.
Ted.
On 11/29/21 7:39 AM, MST wrote:
Hi Ted! Hi there!
I compiled the latest code and did my usual testing with a very large
audio and midi file containing a lot of modulations, tracks, overlapping
notes, ...
So far it works very well for me on Debian 11.
Thanks for your work Philipp and Ted!
Greetings, Michael
P.S.
One thought that strikes me since some time:
After publishing the next version maybe we could _discuss_ "symplifying"
the interface instead of adding new features. For example, what do you
think about the separate midi and audio mixers and their layout,
reducing the multiple appearance of features in many menues. Sorry for
my english :-)
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 16. November 2021 um 15:14 Uhr
*Von:* "Lorenzo Sutton" <[email protected]>
*An:* [email protected]
*Betreff:* Re: [Rosegarden-user] Testing Appreciated for 21.12
Hi Ted,
On 11/11/2021 17:36, Ted Felix wrote:
> 21.12 will be released on December 8. Please test the latest version
> of Rosegarden in git as much as you can. Suggested areas to test can be
> found in the testing notes on the wiki:
>
> https://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/dev:21.12_testing_notes
<https://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/dev:21.12_testing_notes>
Cool, lots of nice stuff in there, e.g. the matrix stuff, adjust. Note
names can be really handy :)
>
> If you've not built Rosegarden before, give it a shot and let us know
> if you run into trouble. We'll walk you through it. I've written up
> instructions on the wiki that should help you through the build process:
>
>
https://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/dev:building_rosegarden_from_source
<https://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/dev:building_rosegarden_from_source>
>
> To help out with 21.12 you can either download a source snapshot, or
> use git to stay up to date with the latest.
Here's some input from trying to test as much as possible:
- Inserting tuplets with the keyboard.
If you insert a triplet (be it with keyboard or mouse) and there is a
note already on the beat ('slot') immediately after, inserting the first
tuplet note (be it triplet or any other) seems to 'eat' back the
previous note ??
For example:
- insert a quater note on beat 2 (2/4) of a 4/4 measure, then start to
insert a quaver (1/8) triplet on beat 1. See what happens (and the note
is actually moved, you can verify this by opening the segment in the
matrix view)
- Track > Add Tracks…. Test the new Device and Instrument fields.
If more than one track is added each subsequent track has device + 1: is
this expected?
- File > Merge > Merge file…. This has been rewritten and could use some
testing of all features.
Doesn't seem to import channel, bank and programme?
- File open/save dialogs: General > Presentation > Use native file
dialogs. Changes appearance of file dialogs.
What's expected? I seem to get the same dialog. I am on XFCE (Manjaro)
with QT 5.15.2 (as reported by Rosegarden).
Lorenzo.
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user>
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
