Pardon me for intruding, but if a substance is only 1 atom thick, is it not
the case that its symmetry is reasonably given by one of the 17 plane
groups, or alternatively by the layer group which simply inserts a mirror
in the plane?

Robert Gould
Tel. 0131 447 8513 or 0796 040 3872


On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 14:23, Mike Glazer <mike.gla...@physics.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Since everything is made of atoms all materials are 3-dimensional. The
> differences lie in the dimensionality of the periodicity, which can be
> n-dimensional. In the case of graphene, you can consider it to be
> 2-dimensional if you are willing to approximate atoms as having 0
> thickness, and then the symmetry would be given by one of the 17 plane
> groups i.e. p6mm. But strictly speaking because everything contains atoms,
> nothing really crystallises in one of the plane groups.
>
> The fact is that everything is 3 dimensional. Graphene is 3 dimensional,
> in my view, because it exists in a 3-d space --- it has weight, it can be
> held in your hand, you can see it,  etc. So strictly speaking, if you
> consider the size of atoms to be relevant, it should be listed as p6/mmm
> layer symmetry. Otherwise you can approximate as 2-dimensional, so it is up
> to you how far you want to approximate. In any case, all observed symmetry
> in crystals results from averaging over space and time.
>
> Mike Glazer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Radovan Cerny <radovan.ce...@unige.ch>
> *Sent:* 30 December 2022 12:44
> *To:* Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Mike Glazer <mike.gla...@physics.ox.ac.uk>; RIETVELD_L Distribution
> List <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
> *Subject:* RE: "2d materials don't exist" editorial??
>
>
>
> Uff, I do not know who has written this page
>
>
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-layer_materials#C:_graphene_and_graphyne
>
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-layer_materials#C:_graphene_and_graphyne>
>
> Single-layer materials - Wikipedia
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-layer_materials#C:_graphene_and_graphyne>
>
> In materials science, the term single-layer materials or 2D materials
> refers to crystalline solids consisting of a single layer of atoms. These
> materials are promising for some applications but remain the focus of
> research. Single-layer materials derived from single elements generally
> carry the -ene suffix in their names, e.g. graphene.Single-layer materials
> that are compounds of two or more ...
>
> en.wikipedia.org
>
>
>
>
>
> but it was not Mike. Graphene is listed among 2D materials as well as
> phosphorene (which I understand easily as its layer is not planar).
>
>
>
> Radovan
>
>
>
> Radovan Cerny
> Laboratoire de Cristallographie
> Université de Genève
> 24, quai Ernest-Ansermet
> CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
> Phone  : [+[41] 22] 37 964 50, FAX : [+[41] 22] 37 961 08
> mailto : radovan.ce...@unige.ch
> URL    : http://www.unige.ch/sciences/crystal/cerny/rcerny.htm
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *De :* Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com>
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 30 décembre 2022 13:33
> *À :* Radovan Cerny <radovan.ce...@unige.ch>
> *Cc :* Mike Glazer <mike.gla...@physics.ox.ac.uk>; RIETVELD_L
> Distribution List <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
> *Objet :* Re: "2d materials don't exist" editorial??
>
>
>
> If you want to have a rant, just have a look at the wikipedia page for
> single-layer materials.
>
>
>
> Phosphorene is particularly egregious:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phosphorene_structure.png
>
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 20:30, Radovan Cerny <radovan.ce...@unige.ch>
> wrote:
>
> OK, I understand. Thank you Mike.
>
>
>
> The graphene is then 2P material with the layer group p6/mmm. Can somebody
> give me an example of a 2D material with the plane group p6mm?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Radovan
>
>
>
> Radovan Cerny
> Laboratoire de Cristallographie
> Université de Genève
> 24, quai Ernest-Ansermet
> CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
> Phone  : [+[41] 22] 37 964 50, FAX : [+[41] 22] 37 961 08
> mailto : radovan.ce...@unige.ch
> URL    : http://www.unige.ch/sciences/crystal/cerny/rcerny.htm
> ------------------------------
>
> *De :* Mike Glazer <mike.gla...@physics.ox.ac.uk>
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 30 décembre 2022 12:20
> *À :* Radovan Cerny <radovan.ce...@unige.ch>; Matthew Rowles <
> rowle...@gmail.com>
> *Cc :* RIETVELD_L Distribution List <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
> *Objet :* Re: "2d materials don't exist" editorial??
>
>
>
> Radovan
>
> Not quite. Graphene  is a 3d material but has periodicity in 2d making its
> symmetry given by one of the 80 subperiodic layer groups.
>
> Mike Glazer
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr <rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr> on behalf
> of Radovan Cerny <radovan.ce...@unige.ch>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2022 11:07:52 AM
> *To:* Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* RIETVELD_L Distribution List <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
> *Subject:* RE: "2d materials don't exist" editorial??
>
>
>
> Thank you Matt,
>
>
>
> for bringing this subject which I have never taken too seriously, butt as
> Massimo pointed out in his paper, there are important differences in what
> symmetry allows for 2D and what for 2P, for example.
>
>
>
> I feel now a bit responsible, because my colleagues at the Quantum matter
> dpt. at UNIGE are working on layered pnictides and call them always 2D
> materials, which is not correct. They are 2P materials. I will try to
> educate them now, even if I am retired. Maybe they can call them 2D
> materials if they talk about the physical properties rather than about the
> structure?
>
> I have already tried to introduce then in the OD theory for polytypic
> structures, but without too much success. They prefer to do their DFT
> modelling rather than have a look on what has been already done.
>
>
>
> A test, whether I have properly understood Massimo: Graphen is 2D
> material, but when I attach anything to it or take more than one layer of
> graphen, it becomes 2P material, right?
>
>
>
> Have a nice end of the year
>
>
>
> Radovan
>
>
>
> Radovan Cerny
> Laboratoire de Cristallographie
> Université de Genève
> 24, quai Ernest-Ansermet
> CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
> Phone  : [+[41] 22] 37 964 50, FAX : [+[41] 22] 37 961 08
> mailto : radovan.ce...@unige.ch
> URL    : http://www.unige.ch/sciences/crystal/cerny/rcerny.htm
> ------------------------------
>
> *De :* rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr <rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr> de la part
> de Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com>
> *Envoyé :* lundi 26 décembre 2022 11:08
> *À :* Alan W Hewat <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
> *Cc :* Leopoldo Suescun <leopo...@fq.edu.uy>; RIETVELD_L Distribution
> List <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
> *Objet :* Re: "2d materials don't exist" editorial??
>
>
>
> These are good learning events.
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
> And it doesn't make much third dimensional periodicity to make a layered
> material act as a bulk 3d material (see recent publications by Kate
> Putman), or at least from a powder diffraction point of view.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2022, 12:40 Alan W Hewat, <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
> wrote:
>
> Symmetry is the Crystallographer's first love, but periodicity is more
> important in deciding to call a structure 2D or 3D. Powder diffraction in
> particular showed that symmetry is ephemeral in many materials, whose
> symmetry is lowered when they are cooled. This symmetry is just the
> consequence of averaging over time and space. Yet we remain fascinated by
> symmetry, sometimes imposing it on Nature when it has no physical
> consequences.
>
>
>
> Great to have a little philosophy to go with the Christmas pudding. Thanks
> Mathew.
>
> ________________________________
> Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics
> Grenoble, FRANCE (from phone)
> alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> +33.476984168 VAT:FR79499450856
> http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat
> _______________________________
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2022, 01:16 Matthew Rowles, <rowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I didn't even know of the existence of the frieze, rod, and layer groups
> until I read this comment.
>
>
>
> So, I guess it's working?
>
>
>
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2022, 22:49 Leopoldo Suescun, <leopo...@fq.edu.uy> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thank you Matt for bringing up this issue.
>
>
>
> Massimo Nespolo has been fighting for the correct description of
> structures, specially focusing on symmetry and proper terminology, for
> years (see his many articles on the misuse of lattice, sublattice,
> superlattice, etc).
>
>
>
> He has, as well, been educating crystallographers of all ages in symmetry
> concepts and use through IUCr's MaThCryst Commision and Internationa School
> on Fundamental Crystallograpy courses around the world.
>
>
>
> He'll probably be remembered by many as a Dick Marsh of symmetry.
>
>
>
> I guess it is the task of all us, crystallographers, to promote the
> correct use of terminology related to crystal structures, as suggested by
> IUCr conventions included in IUCr Dictionary and modern literature.
>
>  https://dictionary.iucr.org/Main_Page
>
>
>
> Best wishes for all of you that, in a way or another have this as a
> special week in your calendars, and Happy New Year for all.
>
>
>
> Leo
>
>
>
> El sáb, 24 de dic. de 2022 05:01, Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> I think this is the one
>
>
>
> https://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S1600576721001606
>
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, 10:00 Matthew Rowles, <rowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This might be it, but the link is to the iucr homepage:
>
>
>
> Google: "letter to the editor" two-dimensional "layer groups" graphene iucr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 09:53, Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> A while ago (months, years??) I recall reading an editorial or letter to
> the editor about materials being referred to as "2D", and how they're
> actually 3D, and just periodic in the plane, and should be referred to as
> 2P and a relevant layer group.
>
>
>
> Does anyone recall such a thing?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Matthew
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> >
> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body
> text
> The Rietveld_L list archive is on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> >
> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body
> text
> The Rietveld_L list archive is on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> >
> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body
> text
> The Rietveld_L list archive is on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to