It depends on how the peak position is determined, if the position is for
the Ka1, use that value, if the position used is for the whole peak
comprised of both Ka1 and Ka2 use the weighted average.

Cheers,
Ed

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:05 PM Nelsonsd <nelson.dua...@ipn.pt> wrote:

> Dear colleagues
>
> I have a small question about conversion of copper to cobalt radiation.
>
> I have characteristic peaks of a Pharmaceutic API (literature) in copper
> radiation and I need to  convert in cobalt radiation, can I use in ka1 of
> copper  (1.54056 A)  and Ka1 of cobalt or the best way is use Ka (ave)
> (1.54184 A) of copper and cobalt ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Best regard
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> >
> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body
> text
> The Rietveld_L list archive is on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>

-- 
Dr. Edward A. Laitila
Senior Research Engineer/Scientist II/Adjunct Assistant Professor
Michigan Technological University
Dept. of MSE
Room 628 M&M Building
(906) 369-2041
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to