---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: 최종락 <jonglakc...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: XRD on cotton yarn
To: Edward Laitila <ealai...@mtu.edu>


Ed,
Thank you for your input for me.
So, as for the area prep., 1mm thick should be enough? and I will try to
cut the area again that I have done it before...May I ask if you know any
article that talked about the quantification analysis in other ways than
cut and weigh?
I really like to express my appreciation for being connected with me again.

Best,

CJ


On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Edward Laitila <ealai...@mtu.edu> wrote:

> CJ,
>
> When doing any quantitative analysis based on intensity one must ensure
> that the sample is larger than the diffracting volume; i.e. the area of
> projection is larger at lower angles while the depth of penetration
> decreases. Make sure the sample is long enough and thick enough. When doing
> this type of analysis you must collect as large of an angle range as needed
> to get enough crystalline and amorphous scattering. If your sample is large
> enough sample holders will not be a problem, if it is not this causes
> issues with the measurement but using a zero background holder  will
> eliminate the additional amorphous scattering but the analysis will be in
> error. If you do not have profile fitting software (using profile fitting
> one can do this by hand if you can also fit the amorphous content) you
> could plot the scans out and cut out the amorphous and crystalline peaks
> and weight them, then remove the crystalline peaks and weigh them, to get
> the ratio of  crystalline area to total area.
>
> Hope that helps some,
> Ed
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:44 AM, 최종락 <jonglakc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>> Hi, how are you, guys.
>> My name is Jonglak choi, who is working on obtaining quantity of
>> crystalline through CI(%)-cyrstal index for natural cotton (cellulose type
>> I). We have Rigaku XRD instrument for obtaining defraction pattern from the
>> cotton yarns. In order to know about the quantity of crystalline phase out
>> of natural mixture of amorphous and crystalline cellulose, I think that 1.
>> I should run XRD to get real one without preferred orientation and z-shift,
>> 2. I should have good and easy way to separate the phases.
>> Do you have any suggestion for 1, and 2 above in my statement?
>> For example.
>> 1. Running XRD, I found glass slides in the room for XRD, quartz or pyrex
>> glass plates; I am interested in 18 degree, and ~20 degree 2theta. which
>> one I can use and background problem?
>> If I simply wrap around the glass slide, hair from yarn should be
>> problem? because it will stick out and move during the collection?
>> If I grind the yarn into powder-it becomes cotton ball after grinding in
>> wiley mill-and fixed on the glass slide with geese, is there any concern?
>>
>> 2. Processing data, after collecting diffraction pattern, what is the
>> best and easy way to know how much crystalline phase exist out of
>> amorphose? I do not have a software for deconvolution now.
>>
>> I am looking forward to hearing suggestions.
>>
>> Thank you and have a great day
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> CJ
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
>> >
>> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body
>> text
>> The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/ri
>> etvel...@ill.fr/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Edward A. Laitila
> Senior Research Engineer/Scientist II/Adjunct Assistant Professor
> Michigan Technological University
> Dept. of MSE
> Room 628 M&M Building
> (906) 369-2041
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to