Hi, I have collected some neutron diffraction data (using GEM, ISIS) of an antiferromagnetically ordered ruthenium (V) oxide (oxidation state is confirmed using various other methods). Refinement of the magnetic moment of the Ru(V) yields very different answers in FullProf and GSAS. The magnetic form factor is the same in both pieces of software, having been entered using the published values by Parkinson et al. (J. Mater. Chem., 2003). Scaling factors have also been checked and I am confident they are consistent. The difference in magnetic moment is significant (GSAS gives 1.4 Bohr Magnetons and FullProf 2.4 Bohr Magnetons).
Does anyone know of any other reason why this might be? Thanks, Craig Hiley Department of Chemistry University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL UK c.i.hi...@warwick.ac.uk<mailto:c.i.hi...@warwick.ac.uk>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
