All deviations from expected values (1.514 and 1.634) are within 3 e.s.u.s
that are around 0.03 A in average.
About absurdity, there are different sensibilities...
With such a definition above, 1.72(3) instead of 1.634 is just OK for
Leonid. Where would he see a limit before applying restraints ? Never,
since he will find also that 1.9(1) is quite excellent, or even 2.2(3) :
all deviations are within 3 e.s.u.s.
I mean, Leonid refuse to see any reliability limit to the powder results.
Absurdity does not exist at all for him (with the exception of mine
apparently).
The difference between us is that I am happy with 1.634(2) but already
think that soft restraints are clearly needed when I have 1.72(3). This is
all my crime...
Best,
Armel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
