Hi Wing,

I purchased LaB6 from http://www.thegemdugout.com/ for a fraction of price
NIST charges and the same quality.

 

Peter Zavalij

 

X-ray Crystallographic Center

University of Maryland

College Park, MD 20742

Phone: 301-405-1861

 

 

 

From: Julian Tolchard [mailto:tolch...@material.ntnu.no] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:27 AM
To: Rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: RE: Intrumental broadening of 2D detector

 

Wing, 

 

This is something which has also been playing on my mind recently - you are
not alone. I don't believe NIST has made LaB6 for a long time. I could use
some more to supplement my dwindling supply, so I bought some LaB6 from
Aldrich with a view to processing and annealing it, but I can't find any
details about the temperature, atmosphere and cooling rates for the
annealing of SRM 660. The certificate only says that it was annealed. I
wonder if someone here knows more details.

 

I remember there was some suggestion that Indium Oxide would also make a
good standard material for this.

 

 

jools

 

 

  _____  

From: Wing Fai Lai [mailto:wfla...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 19 February 2010 01:50
To: Rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Intrumental broadening of 2D detector

 

Dear list members,

 

I'm a beginner in XRD and now trying to estimate the instrumental
broadening.  My final goal is to measure crystallite size and microstrain of
minerals.

 

The equipment I've is Bruker D8 discover with GADDS(2D detector) and XYZ
stage.  I know this is not a setup for high resolution diffractometry but
that's what I have in my lab.

 

I'm unable to get NIST 660 because they have been out of stock for a few
months.  I've NIST 640d, is it good enough for estimating instrumental
broadening or I should prepare LaB6 from heating LaB6(from Sigma) over 300C?
Otherwise, do anybody know where can I get 660?

 

My current setup is: 45kV, 45mA, copper anode, graphite monchromator, 30cm
detector distance, theta1,theta2 starting at 8 degree, both move at 0.5 step
size, to 45degree ,collection time=300s, 0.05mm monocap.  After merging the
frames, I just integrate the middle part of frames.

 

Is this setup okay or what should be improved?

 

Thanks a lot.

 

Regards,

wing fai

 

Reply via email to