Dear Alexandra,

The term “standard configuration” is rather indefinite since PANal has a lot of 
various configurations and accessories. The most straightforward option for 
reducing the low-angle background is the programmable divergence and 
anti-scatter slits. For a fixed slit system the low-angle background may be 
reduced by primary slits and mask of lower divergence and a proper adjustment 
of the beam knife (above the sample) that cuts the air scattering. The 
alignment of the sample holder in the primary beam is also important for 
low-angle measurements.

Best regards,
Leonid

*******************************************************
Leonid A. Solovyov
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology
660049, K. Marx 42, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
www.icct.ru/eng/content/persons/Sol_LA
sites.google.com/site/solovyovleonid
*******************************************************

--- On Fri, 11/27/09, Alexandra Seclaman <seclaman_alexan...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Alexandra Seclaman <seclaman_alexan...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Configuration of PANalytical X'pert Pro
> To: "rietveld_l@ill.fr" <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
> Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 5:09 PM
> Hello,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I have done a Rietveld refinement using a PANalytical
> X'pert
> Pro but the standard configuration is giving me a lot of
> troubles. This
> configuration is somewhat "blind" to the small 2
> theta angles and it
> introduces (because of the poorly focused X ray beam) a
> heavy
> background. I've manage to remove that background by
> refinement but I'm
> sure that the quality of the acquisition can be
> improved.  
> 
> I am no engineer, so the inner workings of that machine are
> somewhat a
> mystery to me. I am asking if someone else has used a
> PANalytical for
> Rietveld and if you can give me a better configuration of
> slots, masks
> etc. I have tried different configurations with no
> success.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please take into consideration, while writing your reply,
> that I'm still a student and I have yet a lot to learn. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you!                        
>                                                            
> 
> 
> Alexandra Seclaman
> 
> seclaman_alexan...@yahoo.com
> 
> a.c.secla...@gmail.com
> 
> 
>       


      

Reply via email to