Dear Maxim,

Actually, there are no standard notations for these parameters of TCH pV. In 
different programs they are designated differently.

Regards,
Leonid

--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Maxim V. Lobanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Maxim V. Lobanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: question on size-strain analysis - question for Fullprof users
> To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 1:00 PM
> Dear Leonid, 
> thank you very much. Indeed it is not "really
> simple": averaging procedure is not straightforward...
> 
> Now a question to Fullprof users:
> it seems that Fullprof is using non-standard designation
> for TCH PV parameters.
> I mean by standard the one which is adopted e.g. in
> D.Balzar et al., JAC 37, 911 (2004) - formula 8b,
> i.e.
> Gamma_L = x/cos(theta) + X/cos(theta) + Y*tan(theta), i.e.
> Lorentzian size broadening is given by X value. GSAS is also
> using this notation.
> 
> In the Fullprof manual it is stated that the designation is
> opposite:
> Gamma_L = X*tan(theta) + Y/cos(theta)
> 
> I am curious if this is still the case, or maybe by chance
> it was corrected in some recent Fullprof update?
> 
> Sincerely,
> Maxim.
> 



      

Reply via email to