Dear Maxim, Actually, there are no standard notations for these parameters of TCH pV. In different programs they are designated differently.
Regards, Leonid --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Maxim V. Lobanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Maxim V. Lobanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: question on size-strain analysis - question for Fullprof users > To: rietveld_l@ill.fr > Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 1:00 PM > Dear Leonid, > thank you very much. Indeed it is not "really > simple": averaging procedure is not straightforward... > > Now a question to Fullprof users: > it seems that Fullprof is using non-standard designation > for TCH PV parameters. > I mean by standard the one which is adopted e.g. in > D.Balzar et al., JAC 37, 911 (2004) - formula 8b, > i.e. > Gamma_L = x/cos(theta) + X/cos(theta) + Y*tan(theta), i.e. > Lorentzian size broadening is given by X value. GSAS is also > using this notation. > > In the Fullprof manual it is stated that the designation is > opposite: > Gamma_L = X*tan(theta) + Y/cos(theta) > > I am curious if this is still the case, or maybe by chance > it was corrected in some recent Fullprof update? > > Sincerely, > Maxim. >