I think that I just did a good job in my quantification: 50,2% calcite and 49,8% dolomite. Now I´m moving foward to a sinthetic mixture of calcite, dolomite and kaolinite.

I have other questin, how can I determine a trustable value to the Full Axial Model?! Especially the these paramters: sample lenght, source lenght and RS lenght?!?!

I´m starting to realize that the temperature factors are the key to the refinement! They change the calculated pattern so much!!!


From: "jilin_zhang_Houston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
To: "rietveld_l@ill.fr" <rietveld_l@ill.fr>
Subject: Re: Problems using TOPAS R (Rietveld refinement)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:39:41 -0600

Leandro :

here is an example of calcite I used. You can use min and max to confine the parameters.

One way to know whether it is right is to mix a known fraction of a compound, e.g. ZnO with a ratio of original sample/ZnO=100/15. At the end of the refinement, you have N components with N corrected(with volume and density) scalefactor, S(i),
Weight(i)=S(i)/S(ZnO)*15
the sum of all weight(i) should be close to 100 if the whole thing is crystalline.


 str
  phase_name calcite
  scale sc_calcite 0.0001813894308
  space_group R-3c
  r_bragg  5.769971925
  Crystallite_Size(cs_calcite, 100 min =100; max =1000;)
Trigonal(a_calcite 4.995096119 min =4.95; max =5.2;,c_calcite 17.08621648 min =16.9; max =17.1;)
  site Ca num_posns 6 x  0 y  0 z  0 occ Ca+2  1 beq  0.95
  site C num_posns 6 x  0 y  0 z =1/4; :  0.25 occ C  1 beq  0.9
  site O1 num_posns 18 x  0.257 y  0 z =1/4; :  0.25 occ O-2  1 beq  0.94
  PO_Spherical_Harmonics(sh_calcite, 2 )

Cheers


J

Hi, guys,

I´m having some trouble using the Bruker software TOPAS R, right now I´m
quantifying a sinthetic sample with 50% of calcite and 50% of dolomite.
Check the following questions an help me if you can.

1) I´m using the CIF files from ICSD, but when I put it in the software it
gives me a temperature factor (beq.) of 1. Is there anyway I can check some
good temperature factors?! When i put then to refine, sometimes they become
negative, but the calculated - observed pattern is just good.

2) I´m using Fundamental Paramaters and for these I must have acknowledge of my instrument, well I have, minus sample lenght... and stuff like that... is
there anyway I can determine these values with accuacy and use them with
sure?!

3) In TOPAS how do I know if the refinement is good?! Because each time I
refine the 50%/50% mixture I have different results and I don´t know wich
one gives me a result that I can trust.

Thank ou in advance,

Leandro Bravo Ferreira da Costa
Student, UFRJ - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - BR
CETEM - RJ

_________________________________________________________________
Inscreva-se no novo Windows Live Mail beta e seja um dos primeiros a testar
as novidades-grátis. Saiba mais:
http://www.ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

_________________________________________________________________
Seja um dos primeiros a testar o novo Windows Live Mail Beta- grátis. Acesse http://www.ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d

Reply via email to