Dear all,
I was making a Rietvled analysis of a neutron powder
diffraction patters from intermetallic compound LaNi4.25Al0.75.
If not using preferred orientation correction, the agreement
indices are a little higher than those when using it.
Like Rp, Rwp, Chi2, RB are respectively from 3.96, 5.33,
2.68, 5.80
to 3.35, 4.42, 1.85,
3.07.
Their patters are:
But at the end of the file *.sum, there's such a
sentence appears:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
=> WARNING!:
Are you really dealing with a preferred orientation problem? -----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not sure of it, hope to hear some
adivce.
If it is, for modifed March's function, the values of
parameters are: Pref1=0.63353, Pref2=0.91337.
In accordance with the manual of FullProf, the powders are
needle-like habit. It means the shape of
powders are like needle or other sth? And what's the meaning
of the fibber axis direction?
By the way, I haven't known how to calulate the site
radius so far. I have read the other two papers
following the suggestion of Dr Alan Hewat, but these two
papers didn't tell the calculation course in
details. Is there some programs which can calculate
it?
Thanks in advance.
-----------
Zhijian Fan E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
- Re: Is it really preferred orientation problem? zhijian fan
- Re: Is it really preferred orientation problem? Jon Wright
- Is it really preferred orientation problem? zavalij
- Re: Is it really preferred orientation problem? zhijian fan
- Re: Is it really preferred orientation problem? Jon Wright
- Re: Is it really preferred orientation proble... Armel Le Bail
- Re: Is it really preferred orientation pr... Alan Hewat