In a message dated 00-11-09 12:39:08 EST, you write:

<< A company such as USG would not be able to lease the ICSD at the $500
 academic price. I no longer remember the for-profit price, but it is
 significantly more. However, these prices cover the cost of tabulating
 the data -- and would likely come down if more people subscribed rather
 than pirated the contents. 
 
 It is a shame that a company that describes themselves as  
 
   "... the world's largest producer of gypsum wallboard, joint compound
 and a vast array of related construction products. As North
   America's number one building materials manufacturer and distributor,
 we are also number one in the North American wallboard and joint
   treatment markets and number two in the ceilings market. 
 
   "With 249 worldwide locations and more than 14,000 employees, USG is
 dedicated to providing innovative building solutions that set new
   standards for productivity and efficiency, helping contractors and
 architects deliver better quality and innovative designs, and
 maintaining
   strong ties with our customers while expanding our global distribution
 reach."
 
 has to resort to requesting structural data via this mailing list.
 
 Brian Toby >>


I know exactly what motivates the requestor from USG: he infrequently has a 
need for a few structural data and is stuck either to call for help on this 
(I admit convenient) forum or buy the entire database for I do not know how 
many thousands of dollars. Therefore, I come back to suggestions I made 
before: 
Make it possible to obtain structural data on a 'pay per structure' basis. 
ASTM, for example, has such a system in place. For $28 a piece online, you 
can download or have faxed to you any ASTM standard desired. Why is this not 
possible with ICSD? It would take out all the controversy whenever somebody 
wants to know a few structural data. It is somewhat ridiculous, to give 
somebody the 'run-a-round' by providing indirect references when the 
information wanted is at the fingertips of many (company bashing does not do 
any good either; USG is a big taxpayer and certainly contributes that the 
people at NIST have heated quarters over the long winter). 

L. Keller 
CAMET Research, Inc.   

Reply via email to