As a user of conventional laboratory powder XRD equipment, I too would like to "touch with my fingers such a wonderful powder pattern" (nice, Armel). I accept visually as a peak one which has five (5) adjacent points observed above background. With a peak having breadth of 0.006 degree, the effective stepsize required is 0.0012 degree (or is HRPD done differently?). Using a stepsize of 0.0012 degree across a 90 degree range produces a really L-A-R-G-E(!) data set. Or again, do practitioners of HRPD do things differently? Educate me. Frank May Department of Chemistry University of Missouri-St. Louis St. Louis, Missouri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- As sent to the neutron mailing list K . Shankland
- Structure Solution vs Structure Determination Brian H. Toby
- Re: As sent to the neutron mailing list Armel Le Bail
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list W . I . F . David
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Dr Erich Kisi
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Armel Le Bail
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list K . Shankland
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Alan Hewat
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Armel Le Bail
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Frank L May
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list P . G . Radaelli
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list W . I . F . David
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list P . G . Radaelli
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Bob Von Dreele
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Armel Le Bail
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Lubomir Smrcok
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Armel Le Bail
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Armel Le Bail
- But Armel, does size matter ? Alan Hewat
- RE: As sent to the neutron mailing list Jon Wright