On Tue, 25 May 1999, Alan Hewat, ILL Grenoble wrote: > > Mainly because the ESD's are only correctly calculated if the model > is CAPABLE of fitting the data. This is not usually true when systematic > errors are important compared to statistical errors, since the model is > usually not capable of describing these systematic errors fully - > background, texture etc... > ...and weights. Lubo
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Brian H. Toby
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements P . G . Radaelli
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Armel Le Bail
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements L. Cranswick
- Negative Biso Hongwu Xu
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements P . G . Radaelli
- Meaning of ESD's Dr. Jaap Vente
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Ed Cussen
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Alan Hewat, ILL Grenoble
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Jon Wright
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Lubomir Smrcok
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Armel Le Bail
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Jon Wright
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements P . G . Radaelli
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements alan . coelho