Jon Wright wrote: >I guess the degradation which is found would come from parameters which >are determined by both datasets and come out with different values in each >separate refinement. Not necessarily. In order to get the ESD, the variance-covariance matrix is multiplied by chi^2, and the roots of the diagonal elements are taken. Therefore, if the chi^2 of the combined refinement is worse than that of the individual ones, the ESD will automatically be worsened. I think this is by far the commonest case. Also, by adding reflections that are insensitive to a given parameter my feeling is that you increase the esd on that parameter even if chi^2=1, but the proof of this is too tedious. Paolo
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Armel Le Bail
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Larry W. Finger
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Lubomir Smrcok
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Armel Le Bail
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Dr. Jaap Vente
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Brian H. Toby
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements P . G . Radaelli
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Armel Le Bail
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements L. Cranswick
- Negative Biso Hongwu Xu
- Meaning of ESD's P . G . Radaelli
- Meaning of ESD's Dr. Jaap Vente
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Ed Cussen
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Alan Hewat, ILL Grenoble
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinemen... Jon Wright
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinemen... Lubomir Smrcok
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinemen... Armel Le Bail
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements Jon Wright
- RE: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements P . G . Radaelli
- Re: Combined neutron/x-ray refinements alan . coelho