On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, kpandey <kumar.pan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there known production installation of riak that uses > riak_kv_memory_backend. Btw, another alternative is to use the leveldb memory-backend impl (prevents gc/storage overhead from erlang tables). You'll have to patch up basho's fork of leveldb and include/compile/enable the memory-backend impl from stock leveldb. > We have a need to store transient data just in > memory ( never hitting persistent store). I'm testing riak on aws with 3 > node cluster and looks good so far. Just wanted to find out what kind of > setup people are using in production. > > Thanks > Kumar > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/riak-kv-memory-backend-in-production-tp4028393.html > Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > -- When the cat is away, the mouse is alone. - David Yu
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
