José, Could you file an issue [1] describing the problems you've been seeing?
Thank you! Cheers, Mathias [1] https://github.com/mostlyserious/riak-js/issues/new On Sunday, 5. May 2013 at 17:24, José Ghislain Quenum wrote: > is this just me or has anyone else experienced some weird behavior trying to > save data into riak using riak-js? My updates are all of a sudden misbehaving. > I upgraded to 0.10.0 since friday night > > On May 4, 2013, at 2:43 PM, José Ghislain Quenum <jose.que...@googlemail.com > (mailto:jose.que...@googlemail.com)> wrote: > > Hi Mathias, > > I didn't use any debug flag. I just did it again and it still created a > > Debug folder instead of Release. Maybe it's my node_gyp> I need to check. > > Has anyone else experienced this? > > BTW I am using OS X Mountain Lion > > José > > On May 4, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Mathias Meyer <me...@paperplanes.de > > (mailto:me...@paperplanes.de)> wrote: > > > José, > > > > > > Do you use any debug flags for npm of sorts? > > > > > > I just tried a fresh install, and npm compiled the library into the > > > Release folder. > > > > > > Cheers, Mathias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, 4. May 2013 at 12:01, José Ghislain Quenum wrote: > > > > > > > in node_modules in my project inside > > > > riak-js/niode_modules/protobuf.js/node_modules/wtf8/wtf8.js > > > > > > > > var wtf8 = require('./build/Release/wtf8.node'); > > > > > > > > but there is no Release folder. Only Debug > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 3, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Mathias Meyer <me...@paperplanes.de > > > > (mailto:me...@paperplanes.de)> wrote: > > > > > José, > > > > > > > > > > Could you elaborate a bit more on that? Not sure I fully understand > > > > > what you mean. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Mathias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, 3. May 2013 at 21:10, José Ghislain Quenum wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > thanks again for the update. the wtf8.node you point at is not > > > > > > there (no Release folder). I pointed to the Debug one and it is > > > > > > fine. Maybe you wanna fix it > > > > > > José > > > > > > On May 3, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Mathias Meyer <me...@paperplanes.de > > > > > > (mailto:me...@paperplanes.de)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just shipped riak-js 0.10.0, with support for Protocol Buffers: > > > > > > > https://npmjs.org/package/riak-js > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To use protobufs, specify a different API option when creating a > > > > > > > client: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > var riak = require('riak-js').getClient({api: 'protobuf'}) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd love to have some feedback on how the protobuffs support > > > > > > > works with real workloads, if anyone feels like trying it out. > > > > > > > Please report any issues you're seeing: > > > > > > > https://github.com/mostlyserious/riak-js/issues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently it's still using a single connection, but I'll work on > > > > > > > adding connection pooling next. Already merged Andrew J. Stone's > > > > > > > support for pooled HTTP connection into the current master, will > > > > > > > work off that for protobuffs as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Nathan LaFreniere for his awesome riakpbc and > > > > > > > protobuf.js libraries, which helped me a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Mathias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > riak-users mailing list > > > > > > > riak-users@lists.basho.com (mailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com) > > > > > > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com