If anyone would like a comparison of Riak to Couchbase with citations for each bullet point, we took a lot of time to make sure our comparisons page is objective and fact based.
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/references/appendices/comparisons/Riak-Compared-to-Couchbase/ is the one for Riak v. Couchbase. -Jared On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Joshua Muzaaya <joshm...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> This is not meant to down-market Riak, but you mentioned Billions of >> records. Riak storage is known to have a few issues as data grows to >> billions. However, Couchbase 2.0 has been kinda battle tested, using SQLite >> at the storage layer. > > > I'm not sure how you are backing up this assertion (citation?). We have > customers storing terabytes of data with billions of records (using > LevelDB). SQLite as the storage engine does not necessarily make Couchbase > more stable or battle-tested, just better known among the wider community. > On the other hand, we have spent the last eighteen months, in collaboration > with the original authors at Google, hardening and improving the > performance of LevelDB to support large deployments, and it now performs > very well (although we still can do better). > > I'm not saying that the OP should not consider Couchbase, but either > product is going to require more than just a casual knowledge of ops to > deploy, manage and maintain. Clustered datastores are not for the > faint-of-heart, so if the OP can do it in a local SQL database, then he > should. > > Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> > Software Engineer > Basho Technologies, Inc. > http://basho.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
