I can't say I'm thrilled to hear this. We use Luwak extensively. > While the idea of Luwak was interesting, we ultimately decided that it > wasn’t the architectural path we wanted to pursue for storing larger > values in Riak.
Does this mean there is still an intention to support storing larger values in Riak in the future? Thanks, Francisco 2011/12/19 David Smith <diz...@basho.com>: > Hi all, > I wanted to take a moment and let the community-at-large know that we > are going to end-of-life the Luwak functionality in Riak, as part of > our 1.1 release in February. This simply means that the Luwak repo on > Github will not be actively developed/supported by Basho, or included > as a default Riak dependency. In keeping with our commitment to Open > Source, the code will still be available if someone else wants to > develop on it. You can also continue to use it with Riak if you are > willing to edit the deps and compile from source -- the Luwak README > will contain information on how to do this. > While the idea of Luwak was interesting, we ultimately decided that it > wasn’t the architectural path we wanted to pursue for storing larger > values in Riak. If Luwak is a piece of your Riak deployment, we’d love > to hear from you and incorporate your feedback into future directions. > Please don’t hesitate to reach out to myself or Mark Phillips. > Thanks, > D. > -- > Dave Smith > Director, Engineering > Basho Technologies, Inc. > diz...@basho.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
