64 on the LevelDB vs 256 on the Bitcask.  I guess that’s it.   Workaround?

 

Thanks,

Jim

 

From: Dan Reverri [mailto:d...@basho.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 9:27 AM
To: Jim Adler
Cc: Ian Plosker; riak-users
Subject: Re: Riak 1.0

 

Hi Jim,

 

Can you check "ring_num_partitions" on each node from "riak-admin status"?

 

Thanks,
Dan


Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com



2011/10/20 Jim Adler <jad...@intelius.com>

I tried the Bitcask-to-LevelDB procedure on 1.0.1 to switch my backend from 
Bitcask to LevelDB. I have one node on Bitcask with my data and the other node 
with a fresh LevelDB backend. When I join the fresh LevelDB node, I get the 
following error:  Failed: r...@xx.xx.xx.xx has a different ring_creation_size

 

riak-admin status | grep creation gives:  ring_creation_size : 256

 

Any ideas?

 

Jim

 

From: riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com 
[mailto:riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] On Behalf Of Ian Plosker
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 8:15 AM
To: 54chen
! Cc: riak-users
Subject: Re: Riak 1.0

 

There are instructions on the wiki: 
http://wiki.basho.com/Secondary-Indexes.html#Migrating-an-Existing-Cluster-(Method-One)

 

Basically, you will have each node leave the cluster, switch the backend, and 
then rejoin. The process is something like this:

 

1) Issue `riak-admin leave` and wait for all transfers to complete

2) `riak stop`

3) Change the backend to the `riak_kv_eleveldb_backend`

4) `riak start` and `riak-admin join <a_node>`

5) Repeat for each node in the cluster

 

 

Ian Plosker

Developer Advocate

Basho Technologies

 

 

On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:41 PM, 54chen wrote:

 

Congratulations!

Can you give me an example of how the 0.14.2(bitcas! k) upgrade to 1.0( 
levelDB)?



2011/10/1 Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com>

Awesome!

Already got it in place on my mac and ubuntu dev boxes. Smooth.

-Alexander Sicular

@siculars
http://siculars.posterous.com <http://siculars.posterous.com/> 


On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:31 PM, David Smith wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am very pleased to announce that Riak 1.0 is tagged and officially
> ready for downloading.
>
> Pre-built installations and source tarballs are available at:
>
> http://downloads.basho.com/riak/CURRENT
>
> Release notes are here:
>
> https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.0/RELEASE-NOTES.org 
> <https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.0/RELE!%20ASE-NOTES.org> 
>
> There is also a blog post about the release here:
>
> http://blog.basho.com/2011/09/30/Riak-1-dot-0-is-Official/
>
> 1.0 has been two years and 15 releases in the making. Thank you all
> for being a part of this project and wonderful community. We couldn't
> have done it without you.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> D.
>
> --
> Dave Smith
> Director, Engineering
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> diz...@basho.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users _lists.basho.com 
> <http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.c!%20om> 


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com




-- 
-
http://www.54chen.com <http://www.54chen.com/>  
http://twitter.com/54chen
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

 


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

 

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to