I've seen that article before, good read. I wouldn't mind building something like that for personal use... *
<http://www.loomlearning.com/> Jonathan Langevin Manager, Information Technology Loom Inc. Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 * On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:09 AM, pille <pille+riak-us...@struction.de> > wrote: > > > > > unfortunately our demand for capacity is increasing faster than > anticipated, > > so waiting for ceph to become stable isn't an option anymore. we don't > have > > human resources for developing a good fuse bindings ourselves. > > > > of course, if we don't find anything, we can simply scale out our > > active/passive architecture we're running at the moment, but this gets > more > > and more complicated, the more servers we throw in. > > > > that's why i'm looking for some beautiful and simple design that > minimizes > > the possibility of administrative failures. > > Probably very off-topic here but we all have to deal with hardware at > some level and this is an interesting brute-force approach to > capacity: > > http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/ > > I believe they only provide an http layer for access, not file system > emulation though, and the software isn't open source. > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
