What Dan said.

He was quicker and more succinct.


On 21 Sep 2011, at 19:53, Russell Brown wrote:

> 
> On 21 Sep 2011, at 19:09, Greg Pascale wrote:
> 
>> A few questions
>> 
>> 1) Is this fix in the RC1 build that just came out today?
> 
> Yes it is.
> 
>> 2) How exactly do search-cmd install, the "search" bucket property and the 
>> precommit hook fit together now? I'm a bit unclear on what I actually need 
>> to do to enable search on a bucket.
> 
> To enable search on a bucket do any of the things you mentioned (add the 
> hook, set {'search': true}, run search-cmd install my_bucket.)
> 
> search-cmd install sets the 'search' bucket property to true. The presence of 
> a true search bucket property cause the search pre-commit hook to be added to 
> the bucket's properties. Likewise, if the pre-commit hook is present but the 
> search property is not, the search property is set to true (for example after 
> an upgrade.)
> 
> Have a look at the code in riak_search_kv_hook.erl[1]  specifically the 
> fixup/2 fun[2].
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Russell
> 
> [1] 
> https://github.com/basho/riak_search/blob/1.0.0rc1/src/riak_search_kv_hook.erl
> [2]  
> https://github.com/basho/riak_search/blob/1.0.0rc1/src/riak_search_kv_hook.erl
> 
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> --
>> Greg
>> Clipboard
>> 
>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Greg Pascale wrote:
>> 
>>> Man, it took a whole day after I complained about this to get it fixed? You 
>>> guys are such slackers! :)
>>> 
>>> Thanks a bunch!
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Greg
>>> Clipboard
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:53:28AM -0700, Greg Pascale wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for getting back to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm doing full-text indexing, but I don't need to keep the text around 
>>>>> once my object has been indexed, so I wrote a second precommit hook to 
>>>>> remove the text from the object. This reduces the size of my objects 
>>>>> drastically (since text tends to be the largest part) and has given us 
>>>>> substantial perf gains in our tests.
>>>> 
>>>> I just pushed a fix for this. It should be present in the next 1.0
>>>> prerelease.
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/basho/riak_search/pull/87
>>>> 
>>>> Andrew
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> riak-users mailing list
>>>> riak-users@lists.basho.com
>>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users@lists.basho.com
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to