On 6/13/2011 2:40 PM, Bryan Fink wrote:
Or if I could take a look at your mock system, maybe I could help with some suggestions for moving in the direction I proposed? We are generally trying to move toward more well-defined APIs (such as PBC/HTTP) and to discourage people from using distributed Erlang to interact with Riak.
Are these going to expose any of the server distribution to clients using PBC/HTTP? It just seems odd that an inherently distributed/masterless system requires an intermediate load balancer/fail over mechanism instead of having clients that know/learn how to round-robin and retry on their own.
-- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
