Well, technically searching within a smaller bucket (with much less keys)
should be faster, correct?

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Aphyr <ap...@aphyr.com> wrote:

> Since buckets are essentially key prefixes, I think buckets will probably
> not make this faster. Maybe one of the riak-search experts knows why your
> search is taking so long.
>
> --Kyle
>
>
> On 05/11/2011 12:00 PM, alexeypro wrote:
>
>> Generally the problem there that I may end up with N buckets, where N is
>> number of users. If I have 5 to 10 mln of users -- then it's a lot of
>> buckets. How Riak will handle it?
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Millions-of-buckets-tp2928567p2928642.html
>>
>> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users@lists.basho.com
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to