On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Thompson <and...@hijacked.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:34:26AM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > 1. GNUMakefile instead of Makefile > This would work if we added a regular Makefile that invoked GNU make > because GNU make looks for GNUMakefile first. > > 2. Allow overriding the configuration > Rebar doesn't support this, to my knowledge. > > 3. Platform specific include files for configuration based on uname. > Not sure how this would work. > > > I've only just started bumping into this problem, so I'm sure you guys > are a > > bit ahead of me :-). > > I think you're about as far in as I am at this point, so not really. > > > My biggest concern is getting the changes upstream so a port is not > > necessary. > > Or at least make it so a port is trivial to create without a bunch of > custom patching. > > Yes, ports are convenient when you can't get stuff upstream. At least that's my feeling. Otherwise a port is still forever a kind of fork. > I'm going to spend 5 minutes and try the GNUMakefile trick and see if it > works. > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
