On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:51 AM, David Mohammed <davidmoham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > There are a number of GPL 2 & 3 based plugins that have been converted to > python3 and thus can & do run in the latest version of RB (below). > > Would Jonathan and the other rhythmbox developers consider it appropriate to > introduce into the source-tree a community section where external developers > could submit their pride-and-joy?
Most of the plugins you listed replace or overlap with existing plugins. I'm not going to accept this sort of thing into the source tree. What would make this community plugins section different to the existing plugins? Would someone be expected to pull in updates to these from external repositories, redirect bug reports and feature requests, feed back any updates that happen in the rhythmbox tree? Would there be some expectation that these plugins are kept up to date when interfaces change, or adapted to make use of new features? I'm not spending all that much time on rhythmbox these days, so anything that involves adding to my maintenance workload is probably not going to work very well. _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
