Hmmm...well that means it also depends on which licenses plugin developers would have to use. Is there a complete list available? On Nov 2, 2013 12:05 a.m., "Bastien Nocera" <had...@hadess.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 00:02 +0000, Donagh Horgan wrote: > > My plugins (comprising three of the list David compiled) are GPLv3. > > I'm not sure of the technical implications of including these in the > > distribution, but it would be extremely convenient from both a user > > and plugin maintenance perspective. I suppose the question is whether > > the change would shift an equivalent (or larger) responsibility on to > > the Rhythmbox developers and whether they'd be happy to accept it. > > Distributions wouldn't be able to ship it, because the licenses are > incompatible. > >
_______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
