Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19851941
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
    @@ -124,6 +125,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(sc: 
SparkContext) extends Logging
           throw new SparkException(s"spark.dynamicAllocation.minExecutors 
($minNumExecutors) must " +
             s"be less than or equal to spark.dynamicAllocation.maxExecutors 
($maxNumExecutors)!")
         }
    +    if (schedulerBacklogTimeout <= 0) {
    +      throw new 
SparkException("spark.dynamicAllocation.schedulerBacklogTimeout must be > 0!")
    +    }
    +    if (sustainedSchedulerBacklogTimeout <= 0) {
    +      throw new SparkException(
    +        "spark.dynamicAllocation.sustainedSchedulerBacklogTimeout must be 
> 0!")
    +    }
    +    if (executorIdleTimeout <= 0) {
    +      throw new 
SparkException("spark.dynamicAllocation.executorIdleTimeout must be > 0!")
    +    }
    +    // Require external shuffle service for dynamic allocation
    --- End diff --
    
    Hm, that's true. We can still call `sc.killExecutors` without the external 
shuffle service, though if the application explicitly calls that then I would 
assume that it's aware of what it's doing. In this case I prefer to require the 
service for dynamic allocation because much of this happens under the hood.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to