vicennial commented on code in PR #49971: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49971#discussion_r1972274605
########## pom.xml: ########## @@ -860,6 +861,56 @@ <version>${protobuf.version}</version> <scope>provided</scope> </dependency> + <dependency> Review Comment: What's the reasoning behind moving/adding these dependencies into the parent Spark pom module? ########## sql/connect/common/pom.xml: ########## @@ -142,8 +218,26 @@ <includes> <include>org.spark-project.spark:unused</include> <include>org.apache.tomcat:annotations-api</include> + <include>com.google.guava:*</include> </includes> </artifactSet> + <filters> + <filter> + <artifact>com.google.guava:guava</artifact> + <excludes> + <exclude>com/google/thirdparty/**</exclude> + </excludes> + </filter> + </filters> + <relocations> + <relocation> + <pattern>com.google.common</pattern> + <shadedPattern>${spark.shade.packageName}.connect.guava</shadedPattern> + <includes> + <include>com.google.common.**</include> + </includes> + </relocation> + </relocations> Review Comment: I'm trying to understand the changes here and in the client pom, which address the `org/spark project/guava/cache/CacheLoader` error. Could you help explain your thought process? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org