dongjoon-hyun commented on code in PR #49741:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49741#discussion_r1936701638


##########
sql/catalyst/benchmarks/HexBenchmark-results.txt:
##########
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 UnHex Comparison
 
================================================================================================
 
-OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 17.0.13+11-LTS on Linux 6.8.0-1017-azure
+OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 17.0.14+7-LTS on Linux 6.8.0-1020-azure
 AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
 Cardinality 1000000:                      Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   
Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Common Codecs                                      4900           4906         
  5          0.2        4900.0       1.0X
-Java                                               4133           4143         
 10          0.2        4133.2       1.2X
-Spark                                              3987           3988         
  1          0.3        3986.6       1.2X
-Spark Binary                                       2762           2766         
  3          0.4        2761.6       1.8X
+Common Codecs                                      5040           5043         
  3          0.2        5039.8       1.0X
+Java                                               3137           3141         
  6          0.3        3136.7       1.6X

Review Comment:
   `Java` becomes faster then `Spark`.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to