El 28/11/24 a las 0:07, Holger Levsen escribió:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 07:17:24PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Because the fix you have in mind involves bothering a lot of people,
or worse, a few people with a lot of work, while the intermediate
status proposed by Bill fixes all the undesired effects you
have listed before.
but then I will still want to bother all those people^wpackages
eventually.
Such process has already started. наб has already reported several
bugs (with severity:normal). Maybe this is not very orthodox without
a MBF email in -devel first, but so be it. I think "normal" is completely ok
at this point.
I hope наб (in CCO) will find the way to tell Jonas about his 150 packages
without filing 150 different bugs.
that said, I now can see how the no-op dh-buildinfo helps to bother
less people^wpackages, eg. those which then can be fixed with a binNMU.
and first, someone needs to actually make dh-buildinfo do a noop,
which hopefully won't bother it's maintainer too much.
I've proposed a patch to the maintainer (which you can read in the bug logs).
I hope he accepts it. If someone else can propose a change for the extended
description, that would also help.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
