Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Still, the bugs I did file were 'useful' in the sense that it was the
> > impetus to do some real-world research in the first place. In that
> > sense, I am *very* much +1 an archive rebuild for this; from my
> > initial investigations by hand, I suspect it will make quite a few packages
> > reproducible and not cause widespread breakage.
>
> do you also agree it's useful to limit this to arm64/unstable for now?
No opinion beyond whatever is quickest and easiest to implement. After
all, the bugs we are likely to uncover are due to testsuites failing
to load newly-built libraries, so I don't think the architecture
'matters'.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org 💠
⬊ ⬋
o
_______________________________________________
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
