El dimecres, 15 de maig de 2019, a les 17:51:14 CEST, Luigi Toscano va escriure: > Nate Graham ha scritto: > > On 5/11/19 4:44 AM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > >> While I find "Apps Bundle" better than "Applications", it still wouldn't > >> be a perfect fit. We should find a better name, ideally as catchy as > >> "Plasma" is, but I don't know if we can. > >> > >> How about going back to "KDE Software Compilation YY.MM" instead? > > > > That seems even worse because it becomes unclear why Plasma and Frameworks > > aren't included in it. > > > > Names have meaning; they're not just for catchy marketing purposes. The > > fundamental problem is that we're trying to name something we haven't > > actually > > defined: What *is* the apps bundle? Why does it exist? What's the logic for > > its contents? > > Names are also names for name's sake. See Firefox, Dolphin, Opera. > Of course Software Compilation does not work as well. > > To answer your question: any name which does not contain generic terms like > "apps" and "bundle" would do. A single name, exactly like "Plasma". > In my work like, the main "product" is called "OpenStack" and each release is > a collection of services with their own names and their own version numbers > (Nova, Cinder, Swift, Oslo, etc) and everything is regularly packaged.
i.e. we could just invent a new name. KDE Galaxy or Kalaxy Personally i'd be much in favor a new random name than changing Applications to Apps Bundle, that is basically calling it the same way. Cheers, Albert
