Nate Graham ha scritto: > On 5/11/19 4:44 AM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: >> While I find "Apps Bundle" better than "Applications", it still wouldn't >> be a perfect fit. We should find a better name, ideally as catchy as >> "Plasma" is, but I don't know if we can. >> >> How about going back to "KDE Software Compilation YY.MM" instead? > > That seems even worse because it becomes unclear why Plasma and Frameworks > aren't included in it. > > Names have meaning; they're not just for catchy marketing purposes. The > fundamental problem is that we're trying to name something we haven't actually > defined: What *is* the apps bundle? Why does it exist? What's the logic for > its contents?
Names are also names for name's sake. See Firefox, Dolphin, Opera. Of course Software Compilation does not work as well. To answer your question: any name which does not contain generic terms like "apps" and "bundle" would do. A single name, exactly like "Plasma". In my work like, the main "product" is called "OpenStack" and each release is a collection of services with their own names and their own version numbers (Nova, Cinder, Swift, Oslo, etc) and everything is regularly packaged. -- Luigi
