----- Original Message ----- > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > A Thursday, June 02, 2011, Stephen Kelly va escriure: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The ongoing mess regarding the shared desktop ontologies shows > >> that the > >> time between hard feature freeze and tagging is not long enough. > >> > >> Making destructive or potentially destructive changes on the day > >> of > >> freeze (and one week before tagging) is a very bad idea. If it > >> happens > >> anyway, then hopefully schedule changes can soften the blow in the > >> future. > >> > >> I propose a smaller 'merge window' in release branches and a > >> bigger time > >> between hard freeze and the start of the tagging cycle. Clearly > >> one week > >> is not enough to fix messes. That will give everyone more time > >> (before > >> tagging) to fix messes introduced on the day of freeze in the > >> future. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > Of which time are you speaking about exactly, the one between > > Dependency > > Freeze and Beta 1 Tagging? > > Sort of I guess. If a feature or dependency bump which creates a mess > is > committed on the day of feature freeze I don't think there is enough > time to > fix it and at the same time stay relaxed because there is only a > week. In > the 4.7 schedule it was between 12th May and 19th May. I was away > travelling > for part of that week. > > > > > How much time are you suggesting? > > What would you think of two weeks? Or three?
Again, is this about the feature freeze or dependency freeze? Best, -- Tom Albers KDE Sysadmin _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
