Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Thursday, June 02, 2011, Stephen Kelly va escriure: >> Hi, >> >> The ongoing mess regarding the shared desktop ontologies shows that the >> time between hard feature freeze and tagging is not long enough. >> >> Making destructive or potentially destructive changes on the day of >> freeze (and one week before tagging) is a very bad idea. If it happens >> anyway, then hopefully schedule changes can soften the blow in the >> future. >> >> I propose a smaller 'merge window' in release branches and a bigger time >> between hard freeze and the start of the tagging cycle. Clearly one week >> is not enough to fix messes. That will give everyone more time (before >> tagging) to fix messes introduced on the day of freeze in the future. >> >> Thoughts? > > Of which time are you speaking about exactly, the one between Dependency > Freeze and Beta 1 Tagging?
Sort of I guess. If a feature or dependency bump which creates a mess is committed on the day of feature freeze I don't think there is enough time to fix it and at the same time stay relaxed because there is only a week. In the 4.7 schedule it was between 12th May and 19th May. I was away travelling for part of that week. > > How much time are you suggesting? What would you think of two weeks? Or three? > > Albert > _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
