Yep, I think that's more solid.  Thanks!

-MSK

On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 6:38 AM Carroll, William <wicarr...@verisign.com>
wrote:

> Murray,
> Thanks for your review. We think MUST would make sense here. Would this
> change to 5.1.3.4 address your concern?
> Old:
> The sacrificial name server SHOULD resolve to one or more IP addresses and
> the client SHOULD operate an authoritative DNS name server on those
> addresses. The name server MAY provide any valid response.
>
> New:
> The client-maintained dedicated sacrificial name server MUST resolve to
> one or more IP addresses and the client MUST operate an authoritative DNS
> name server on those addresses. The name server MAY provide any valid
> response.
>
> Thanks!
> Bill
>
> On 3/6/25, 1:14 AM, "Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker" <nore...@ietf.org
> <mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-09: No Objection
>
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1h9oBD_yR3NTuiYsc7Ubw7DYLJeN2Tcb9xdK2LghygXCiwbhSoVzKobdtMc0kOadIguLk7ekIGRLkHybIfY29tSiBkxD2Whuk-mO9mE82Amr5vzu4Igp66cE51qar0SXT1mxjaqQ7UHGHf0yXcXdVwsZDYt74ByT54bp7d9LMh7rBRXhfwhdQuAU-mqrF5-YJOGLbxYMjRsApuPwvvj6XrqdPmWEF4ZF7Okegn3Ds0RZ_zg-PGvJ2vxyahO-2v98sQZ4Ro2p6nQTKgpna4aLGj8csisdHwWBZ6qIFYzuRIak/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1h9oBD_yR3NTuiYsc7Ubw7DYLJeN2Tcb9xdK2LghygXCiwbhSoVzKobdtMc0kOadIguLk7ekIGRLkHybIfY29tSiBkxD2Whuk-mO9mE82Amr5vzu4Igp66cE51qar0SXT1mxjaqQ7UHGHf0yXcXdVwsZDYt74ByT54bp7d9LMh7rBRXhfwhdQuAU-mqrF5-YJOGLbxYMjRsApuPwvvj6XrqdPmWEF4ZF7Okegn3Ds0RZ_zg-PGvJ2vxyahO-2v98sQZ4Ro2p6nQTKgpna4aLGj8csisdHwWBZ6qIFYzuRIak/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F>
>
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ok2AST0AMFAybg_ZNP3djzRqC1ugzAHtlLMoIl0Q4BhN6xo7_lh7gRO-Q3NEqFrg6drIR8jzw9PbsZt7CtVyI95rDZcDbUUbbqzXe882tudxb3dwUoTKuPz5EKyTnt7ZEbOrU58PD3R5drISPazIBSIJUY5zwzOAK4s8HZtu_Wlm1yDHEXcqKC5hsgJUVx6X7La9uk7_uX9XRybDUG-9ru0J826DkvVGXjHKfI2XTeA56YixOnQnAhYZhWlerRVUgD7ai7CHeWK7hiKN0fuQz-EqbMjcX3Hkm1xjOFP-Ok0/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp%2F
> <
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ok2AST0AMFAybg_ZNP3djzRqC1ugzAHtlLMoIl0Q4BhN6xo7_lh7gRO-Q3NEqFrg6drIR8jzw9PbsZt7CtVyI95rDZcDbUUbbqzXe882tudxb3dwUoTKuPz5EKyTnt7ZEbOrU58PD3R5drISPazIBSIJUY5zwzOAK4s8HZtu_Wlm1yDHEXcqKC5hsgJUVx6X7La9uk7_uX9XRybDUG-9ru0J826DkvVGXjHKfI2XTeA56YixOnQnAhYZhWlerRVUgD7ai7CHeWK7hiKN0fuQz-EqbMjcX3Hkm1xjOFP-Ok0/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp%2F
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Why are they only SHOULDs in Section 5.1.3.4? Why not MUST? Under what
> circumstances might an implementer or operator legitimately do something
> other
> than what it says here?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to