Murray,
Thanks for your review. We think MUST would make sense here. Would this change 
to 5.1.3.4 address your concern?
Old:
The sacrificial name server SHOULD resolve to one or more IP addresses and the 
client SHOULD operate an authoritative DNS name server on those addresses. The 
name server MAY provide any valid response.

New:
The client-maintained dedicated sacrificial name server MUST resolve to one or 
more IP addresses and the client MUST operate an authoritative DNS name server 
on those addresses. The name server MAY provide any valid response.

Thanks!
Bill

On 3/6/25, 1:14 AM, "Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker" <nore...@ietf.org 
<mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:


Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe. 


Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-09: No Objection


When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)




Please refer to 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1h9oBD_yR3NTuiYsc7Ubw7DYLJeN2Tcb9xdK2LghygXCiwbhSoVzKobdtMc0kOadIguLk7ekIGRLkHybIfY29tSiBkxD2Whuk-mO9mE82Amr5vzu4Igp66cE51qar0SXT1mxjaqQ7UHGHf0yXcXdVwsZDYt74ByT54bp7d9LMh7rBRXhfwhdQuAU-mqrF5-YJOGLbxYMjRsApuPwvvj6XrqdPmWEF4ZF7Okegn3Ds0RZ_zg-PGvJ2vxyahO-2v98sQZ4Ro2p6nQTKgpna4aLGj8csisdHwWBZ6qIFYzuRIak/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F
 
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1h9oBD_yR3NTuiYsc7Ubw7DYLJeN2Tcb9xdK2LghygXCiwbhSoVzKobdtMc0kOadIguLk7ekIGRLkHybIfY29tSiBkxD2Whuk-mO9mE82Amr5vzu4Igp66cE51qar0SXT1mxjaqQ7UHGHf0yXcXdVwsZDYt74ByT54bp7d9LMh7rBRXhfwhdQuAU-mqrF5-YJOGLbxYMjRsApuPwvvj6XrqdPmWEF4ZF7Okegn3Ds0RZ_zg-PGvJ2vxyahO-2v98sQZ4Ro2p6nQTKgpna4aLGj8csisdHwWBZ6qIFYzuRIak/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F>
 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.




The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ok2AST0AMFAybg_ZNP3djzRqC1ugzAHtlLMoIl0Q4BhN6xo7_lh7gRO-Q3NEqFrg6drIR8jzw9PbsZt7CtVyI95rDZcDbUUbbqzXe882tudxb3dwUoTKuPz5EKyTnt7ZEbOrU58PD3R5drISPazIBSIJUY5zwzOAK4s8HZtu_Wlm1yDHEXcqKC5hsgJUVx6X7La9uk7_uX9XRybDUG-9ru0J826DkvVGXjHKfI2XTeA56YixOnQnAhYZhWlerRVUgD7ai7CHeWK7hiKN0fuQz-EqbMjcX3Hkm1xjOFP-Ok0/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp%2F
 
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ok2AST0AMFAybg_ZNP3djzRqC1ugzAHtlLMoIl0Q4BhN6xo7_lh7gRO-Q3NEqFrg6drIR8jzw9PbsZt7CtVyI95rDZcDbUUbbqzXe882tudxb3dwUoTKuPz5EKyTnt7ZEbOrU58PD3R5drISPazIBSIJUY5zwzOAK4s8HZtu_Wlm1yDHEXcqKC5hsgJUVx6X7La9uk7_uX9XRybDUG-9ru0J826DkvVGXjHKfI2XTeA56YixOnQnAhYZhWlerRVUgD7ai7CHeWK7hiKN0fuQz-EqbMjcX3Hkm1xjOFP-Ok0/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp%2F>






----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Why are they only SHOULDs in Section 5.1.3.4? Why not MUST? Under what
circumstances might an implementer or operator legitimately do something other
than what it says here?









_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to