Il 15/01/2025 21:05, Andrew Newton (andy) ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 5:38 AM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote:
Hi Andy,
On 14.01.25 17:42, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:35 PM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote:
[PK] as indicated above it is not about the extension specifying the
referral.
Understood, but how does the current text not allow this?
I was guided by the interpretation that the text in 4.2 applies to
referrals specified by a given extension. If the intention of the text
is that it applies to any referrals, also to those specified elsewhere,
then it's OK, but maybe giving it an explicit wording in the text would
make it also very clear to the authors of future extensions.
I think that is a good enhancement. Along with "servers MUST NOT use
multiple extensions in a response with processing requirements over
the same referrals."
Sorry by I didn't catch this. Does it mean that a server MUST NOT
include multiple extensions in the same link ?
Mario
-andy
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
--
Dott. Mario Loffredo
Senior Technologist
Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
Address: Via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
