On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 5:38 AM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > On 14.01.25 17:42, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:35 PM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote: > >> > >> [PK] as indicated above it is not about the extension specifying the > >> referral. > > Understood, but how does the current text not allow this? > > > I was guided by the interpretation that the text in 4.2 applies to > referrals specified by a given extension. If the intention of the text > is that it applies to any referrals, also to those specified elsewhere, > then it's OK, but maybe giving it an explicit wording in the text would > make it also very clear to the authors of future extensions.
I think that is a good enhancement. Along with "servers MUST NOT use multiple extensions in a response with processing requirements over the same referrals." -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
