Hi,In the course of the actual discussion on the clarity of documents we produce, especially related to implementation maturity of the solutions I would need to repeat the remark I brought up during the call for adoption [1].
I think the document, being a BCP, should be very specific about which methods have already been field proven and which are kind of experimental with unknown implementation or operational impact.
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/lDkYhEak6_JehglG-YuqxBpwgrw/
Kind Regards, Pawel On 03.06.24 16:56, James Galvin wrote:
The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best Current Practice: Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp/03/ Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient). If any working group member has questions regarding the publication of this document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of business everywhere, Monday, 17 June 2024. If there are no objections the document will be submitted to the IESG. The Document Shepherd for this document is Andy Newton. Thanks, Antoin and Jim REGEXT WG Co-Chairs _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
